One of the redeeming features of Face Book is that it has facilitated the reunification of any number of us who grew-up together and came of age in the 60s and 70s. I suppose we can thank COVID for more free time and screen time. Add to this a milestone High School reunion only a couple of years ago. After roughly 50 years of separation for some of us the reconnection has been a good thing.
Plenty has changed for many of us; nevertheless, becoming reacquainted is A-OK by my standards. FB has become our Town Square and gathering spot to share thoughts and opinions and remain in-touch. And while the pace of new friends and acquaintances may have slowed the list continues to grow. In any event, one of those pals from the old neighborhood posted this photo on his FB page including his own words (italics) preceding it:
The Democrats saw Obama as their chosen one that would lead them into their socialistic utopia. When Trump was elected those same people realized that their utopic dreams were not going to be realized. They then started hating and attacking anything and anyone that threatened the " progress" they believed they had made politically and culturally in transfirming/destroying the USA.
So, their protesting and at times violence is the continuation of their deranged hatred of President Trump. If Kamala or some other person adored by their Party was directing these deportations there would be no issue no protests, no threats to Law enforcement personnel. Hypocritical in their thoughts and actions. Sad, real sad.
I commented with this:
I was actually studying-up on this phenomenon this afternoon. Under Obama, interdiction and deportation was hardly ever public and rarely involved any drama. Not even background noise. Interestingly, very close to same in the early years of the first Trump administration. I absolutely know what changed (because I took old fashioned notes). 10 guesses anyone?
The
discussion that followed included defenses of President Trump
considering everything from Trump Derangement Syndrome, generalized
media bias, to perceived Face Book and iPhone (Apple) algorithm biases. My childhood pal shared this: I respect your research and notes Tom. Please share.
So I did. I had to cut and paste my notes from my laptop resulting in poor formatting; nevertheless editable. They are as follows:
Here’s
a brief summary of deportations under Barack Obama (2009–2017) and
Donald Trump - (both terms, including his second term starting in 2025) -
focused on ICE/DHS removals/deportations by the numbers. Note: The Trump second term is incomplete and stats both reflect that and are annotated.
Over
the eight years (2009 - 2017) of Obama’s presidency, ICE and DHS
reported approximately 3.1 million immigration removals/deportations.
Highlights - FY 2012: ~409,849 deportations — one of the highest annual
totals. FY 2013: ~438,421 deportations — often cited as the highest
year.
Observations:
Deportations
were high early in his tenure and declined later — partly due to
changes in enforcement priorities and declining border apprehensions.
Later years saw lower totals: ~235,413 in FY 2015 and ~240,255 in FY
2016
Obama’s
approach focused more on recent border crossers and noncitizens with
criminal convictions, rather than broad interior enforcement.
Trump Administration (2017 - 2021 & 2025 - ?)
First
Trump term (2017–2021): DHS/ICE data shows fewer overall removals than
under Obama, with around 932,000 deportations reported over those four
years.
Second Trump administration (2025 onward): Data is less centralized, but multiple sources provide partial figures: ICE
deported nearly 200,000 people in the first seven months of 2025 alone.
Some government estimates suggest combined deportations + other
removals could reach ~300,000+ in FY 2025 under Trump’s enforcement
surge. Public reports cite overall removals including border expulsions
and voluntary departures in the hundreds of thousands by the end of
2025.
Observations:
Trump’s
highest annual ICE deportation figures (e.g., ~267,000–300,000+)
clearly have not surpassed Obama’s peak year totals (which were ~438,000
in 2013).
The
Trump administration’s enforcement in 2025 increased interior ICE
arrests and targeted broader categories of unauthorized immigrants
including many without criminal records.
Data
releases from DHS/ICE have been inconsistent, making comprehensive
year-by-year comparisons harder than with historical Obama data.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST
1. Enforcement Priorities: Targeted Arrests vs. Universal Arrests
Obama:
Focused
on enforcement priorities aimed at public safety: Serious criminals,
national security threats and recent border crossers. ICE was supposed
to emphasize these groups before acting on others; this constrained the
agency’s interior enforcement focus.
Trump:
Early
executive orders broadly expanded enforcement priorities to include all undocumented non-citizens as targets for arrest and removal. This
resulted in enforcement shifting from a targeted, risk-based approach to a
wide net aiming to arrest anyone removable under immigration law.
2. Criminal History Composition of Arrests
Obama:
A
larger share of ICE interior arrests historically involved people with
criminal convictions. ICE largely confined interior enforcement to those
with broader public safety concerns.
Trump:
Recent
data show a dramatic rise in arrests of people with no criminal
records. Nearly 1/3 of those arrested in 2025 by ICE had no criminal
history. Another report suggests tens of thousands without criminal
convictions were picked up, contradicting official focus on criminals.
Independent data also show a sharp shift in arrest composition, with
non-criminal individuals making up a much higher share of total ICE
detentions under Trump.
3. At-Large vs. Custodial Arrests
Obama:
ICE
largely arrested individuals already in jail/prison (custodial arrests)
via information sharing with local jails and prisons; use of at-large
arrests (sweeps in communities) was more limited.
Trump:
ICE
dramatically increased at-large arrests — apprehending people in homes,
workplaces, and communities rather than primarily from jails. This
shift meant broader, more public operations compared with the
historically jail-linked approach.
4. Collaboration with Local Law Enforcement
Obama:
ICE
cooperation with local police/jails — such as through Secure Communities— was significant but tempered by enforcement priorities and
some jurisdictions’ non-cooperation.
Trump:
Expansion
of programs like 287(g) dramatically increased the role of local police
in immigration enforcement, allowing them to question and detain
immigrants for ICE — a tactic scaled back or de-emphasized under Obama.
5. Detention Policy and Public Operations
Obama:
Fewer
large-scale, publicized raids; enforcement often occurred in less
visible ways (custodial transfers from local jails, routine immigration
check-ins).
Trump:
Enforcement
has included public raids, frequent at-large operations, and actions in
“sensitive locations” that were avoided under prior internal DHS
policies — including immigration court check-ins, workplaces, and
neighborhoods. ICE has also faced criticism for increased detention
populations and facility deaths tied to expanded enforcement.
6. Policy Framing and Quotas
Obama:
Restored
a degree of prioritization to manage enforcement resources and judicial
backlogs, focusing removal on higher-risk individuals in many years.
Trump:
Reports
indicate daily arrest “quotas” and political mandates for mass
enforcement, with leadership pushing ICE to meet broad arrest targets
rather than focusing solely on prioritized categories.
Summary:
Obama’s
ICE tactics centered more on defined enforcement priorities and
collaboration with the criminal justice system; whereas, Trump’s approach
expanded who could be targeted, expanded community arrests, and
integrated local law enforcement more deeply, resulting in broader
sweeps and more arrests of people without criminal records.
*Note: The notion that I had burned about three hours time (time I will never get back) that same afternoon was a consequence of a FB post - including an eight year-old YouTube "Ride With ICE" video - from another neighborhood pal of mine. It was thought-provoking and encouraged me to initiate some background as it didn't get anyone's interest on FB other than me and maybe one additional individual.
Inasmuch as things went silent on my pal's FB page following posting my notes I added an additional comment for purposes of background (see asterisk above) on Sunday morning. That comment, including the YouTube video, are as follows:
As a follow-up to my notes I posted yesterday I want to share that the
inspiration for my inquiry into this subject was a post that (name redacted) put out there four days ago.
In it he asked: "8+yrs ago Obama's Ice
agent's were well respected heroes, just doing their job.
wonder what changed?" (Note: Video is dated August 25, 2017 making these Trump's ICE agents. Typo?)
The video is from 8 years ago
and taken during the first year of the first Trump term. It's not very
long so watch it to the end and then afterwards ask yourself "what
changed between Trump 1.0 and 2.0 with respect to ICE protocols and
reflecting on the differences between the two Presidents and their
approach to interdiction and deportation.
Not stirring things-up as I happen to think (name redacted) has raised an excellent point and asked a thought-provoking question.
Have
you ever wondered what it's like during the life of an Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agent? Phil Shuman of Fox 11, Los Angeles, takes
you along for a ride on August 25, 2017.
At the time of this post's publication that thread has gone silent. No further discussion. The point I was attempting to make (perhaps not very clearly) was we have the same President today as eight years ago. Almost at the same point in time of each presidential term.
The clip is from the first year of the first Trump term in 2017. Contrast that with ICE operational procedures today - the first year of the second Trump term in 2025.
Are there objective differences between ICE agents and their protocol between then and now?
If any, what may they be? What, if anything, changed?
I have some working theories about how, and why, ICE evolved between Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0
Including myself we hosted six hunters here for the gun deer opener and successfully added eight whitetails (four of each sex) to the camp meat poles. For various reasons the number of hunters has skinnied-down recently yet the kill count stays about the same.
Anyway, the trail cameras continued through the entirety of the ruckus and I thought it would be fun to share some photos of their comings and goings.
Including these of one of the guys heading out to his stand before sunrise who was tailed by a fox.
This weekend we're hosting my business partner, some of her family and anyone else that wants to join the fun for the December antlerless hunt.
This year’s Deer Camp is the 30th Anniversary Edition. That’s not
nearly as long as my neighbors multi-generational traditions but as a
latecomer to big game hunting it’s fine by me.
Brandy from the land of my birth
Anyway, another tradition is the food. I’m going to overlook something
I’m sure; but over four days I dined on something on the order of five
varieties of sardines, two kinds of liver pate and two iterations of
homemade smoked Hungarian sausage (old family recipe).
Bobby’s homemade smoked Hungarian sausage
This was followed by venison chili
dogs and Lawyer's gourmet venison bolognese.
My infamous homemade navy bean soup built upon a foundation of Marchant’s smoked pork hocks.
Jägermeister. Ja!
Raw beef and onions on marble rye and a half a dozen kinds of cheese, sourdough bread,
French baguettes and washed it down with adult beverages from the
peninsula stretching all the way to Europe.
The humble hard boiled egg
is the perfect deer stand snack you can fit in the pocket of your parka.
Thanks guys for another hunt in the record books…..
Deer Camp Pals....
Been perusing some older digital photos in the collection and came
across this one. It was taken during a rain-sodden deer camp in
November of 2005.
The perspective is looking west out of the second floor blue bedroom.
Except for low-light conditions there was no way a whitetail could sneak
across this stretch of territory without being vulnerable.
Twenty years later - not so much. It's some dandy permanent cover out there nowadays. A real forest...
It was only a couple of weeks ago I was in eastern South Dakota chasing pheasants; Friday is a reunion of sorts as several of the usual suspects from that trip will find their way here for the gun deer opener this coming Saturday. I figure smoked pheasant will find its way into our diet next weekend.
Anyway some photos from the the pheasant hunt...
Queuing-up to push some grass
And some post hunt images back at the outfitter's barn...
$2 Beers and $3 Hi Balls
And at our rental house. For ten guys a terrific set-up with a couple of bathrooms, a bunch of bedrooms, bunks and kitchen.
Most days my dog gets a dose of outdoor exercise; an important factor to successfully raising a puppy. Especially a sporting breed. As a consequence my dog takes her sleep very seriously.
And by the time this post is published Braumeister and I will be driving home following a trip to South Dakota to chase pheasants. It's likely he, me and the dog are gonna crash tonight.
Check-back in the next week for photos and if we were successful. Or not.
When we lived in Germany my folks took a trip thru East Germany to Berlin. I still have my Soviet Visa authorizing my passage to the Russian Zone. Yes, even a small child might have to produce his 'papers' on demand. This was before the Soviets built a wall and before this cold war stand-off.
By the time this photo was snapped in 1961 we had already returned stateside.
In 2023, accompanied by two additional couples, we traveled thru what had previously been East Germany and took some photos at Checkpoint Charlie.
What a difference 62 years makes.....
That KFC location is priceless. Further evidence of significant progress following reunification....
I recently made a run to Miesfeld's in Sheboygan to fetch the last batch of venison from the 2024 deer season. It took a while for everything to be processed; yet it's completed.
Garlic summer sausage, snack sticks, wieners and bacon. Yes, there is such a thing as deer bacon.
I had previously taken an additional batch of venison to Marchant's Meats in Sturgeon Bay to have brats and regular summer made. Much faster turn-around. And by the time you read this all but the
shares belonging to a couple of hunters will have been distributed and
likely found its way to a summer grilling session.
In case you're wondering about the economics it works out like this:
Four
deer skinned, cut and wrapped was $520; split six ways is $87 a
hunter. Everyone received a generous helping of steaks, chops and burger. On top of that there was another generous selection of brats, wieners, snack sticks, summer sausage
and bacon. $560 total ($381 Miesfeld's and $179 Marchant's) split six
ways is $93 a hunter. All-in that comes to $180 a hunter. And if you've been paying attention to the price of meat lately this is a decent deal; considering the overall
yield. (Note to self - take photos next time).
Making the local paper can be a good thing or a bad thing - depending-upon the circumstances surrounding the coverage. In this case it is a good thing; on a couple of levels.
First, promoting the idea of non-confrontational dialogue covering current events and difficult topics is a good thing. Actually accomplishing it makes it a better thing.
For several years now I've been the class coordinator for a Learning In Retirement course titled: A Fine Kettle Of Fish. It's a class covering current affairs held spring and fall semesters at the local community college.
I am also a participant most Friday mornings in the Third Avenue Discussion Group; Group for short.
Made a bunch of new friends of all political persuasions and of varied backgrounds. Further evidence the peninsula is really a little-known giant brain trust.
The other thing materializing that is a sure sign of spring are the Eastern Fox Snakes.
They've thawed-out, emerged from their dens and have taken to sunning themselves at every opportunity.
Allow me to introduce you to Pantherophis vulpina – the Eastern Fox Snake.This is a valuable animal to have around your yard as they dine principally upon rodents. If you are a gardener they are your ally.Belonging
to the family of snakes that are constrictors - upon seizing their prey
they coil around it to suffocate the animal. After which they swallow
it whole.Their lower jaw is unhinged allowing this critter to swallow a rodent or bird five times the diameter of their head. Yum!
This snake has many large reddish-brown, chocolate brown or black
mid-dorsal blotches along its back and other smaller blotches on its
sides on a background color of yellow, tan or olive-gray. The head of
adults is usually a dark copper, rust or orange color. They live in a
variety of open habitats including marshes, sedge meadows, prairies and
old fields.
Their diet consists primarily of rodents and ground-nesting birds. Young
fox snakes will occasionally eat amphibians. This species is the most
frequently encountered snake in people's homes, especially if the house
has an old rock foundation where the snake(s) may be hunting for food or
hibernating in the basement. The fox snake is often mistaken for the
venomous copperhead due to its head color and subsequently is often
killed.
Copperheads do not live in or near Wisconsin. Fox snakes are also
often mistaken for rattlesnakes, as they often "rattle" their tails in
dry leaves, grasses or against objects when disturbed. Their pointed
tail distinguishes them (and all other Wisconsin snakes with pointed
tails) as a non-venomous species in Wisconsin.
Doggo is still trying to figure out if they are friend or foe....
After a couple year-long turkey drought the dam broke yesterday and I dropped a real nice gobbler with a record-breaking fifteen minute hunt.
Yup. No sooner than a sat down and made some initial calls this gobbler walks-in from behind me, quietly making a beeline for my jake decoy.
Kaboom!
I never even unpacked the book I brought to read.
I didn't pluck this bird choosing to butcher it and break it down into its component parts.
I got two - three pound - pieces of breast meat; I'm thinking stir fry and risotto for starters. The hind quarters are destined for homemade wild turkey vegetable noodle soup.
My pals Lawyer and Braumeister are on deck with tags for next week and the following.
From last weekend we got enough overnight to head-out for a post breakfast romp. Not quite enough for snow shoes but 4-5 inches of white stuff nonetheless. 1.2 miles for me. Somewhere north of 2 miles for the doggo. And 3 miles for our guests.
Ruby is absolutely nuts for snow and was tearing-it up at every opportunity.
Duck
confit (con-fee) is one of the most luxurious of foods in French
cuisine. This means seasoned and cured duck legs bathed in their own
fat and slowly cooked to falling-off-the-bone perfection. This is
followed by crisping the skin in a pan or oven – resulting in a
sinful combination of juicy meat and crackling skin.
Authentic
confit takes several days to make but this recipe is a mash-up,
work-around, hack of the NYT’s Melissa Clark recipe that you can
cook in an afternoon. It is really good and super easy.
Get
yourself some duck legs. They’re not easy to find unless attached to the
entire duck but Bunzel’s in Milwaukee has them in pairs from the
freezer case. A specialty grocer may be the place to source them
fresh or frozen.
Prep
time: 20 minutes
Rest
the fridge: 1 to 4 days
Cook
time: 3 hours
Ingredients
1
½ teaspoons kosher salt
1
teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
½
teaspoon dried thyme
1
bay leaf, crumbled
4
duck leg quarters (about 4 pounds total), rinsed and patted dry but
not trimmed
Duck
fat-fried or smashed garden potatoes, noodles, spaetzle and
lightly-dressed bitter salad greens such as arugula, chicory
and/or radicchio, for serving
Preparation
Pat
the duck legs dry with paper towels. Using a needle or a very sharp
knife and prick the skin all over. Focus on the skin that covers fat.
Do your best to avoid piercing the meat itself by pricking the skin
at an angle over the drumstick and the center of the thigh. You are
doing this to give the fat that lies under the skin a place to seep
out – if you don’t do this, it will be far more difficult to get
crispy skin.
In
a pestle combine salt, pepper, thyme and bay leaf pieces. Crush thoroughly. Sprinkle
duck generously with mixture. Do not skimp on the coarse salt.
Place duck legs in a pan in one layer. Cover tightly with plastic
wrap and refrigerate for a minimum of 24 hours. Your legs can fester
for up to four days.
The
next day, heat oven to 275 degrees. Place duck legs, skin side down,
in a large ovenproof skillet, with legs fitting snugly in a single
layer (you may have to use two skillets or cook them in batches).
Roast uncovered until fat starts to render – about one hour.
If
you are making duck fat-fried taters this is a good time to ladle
rendered fat into your fry pan.
Reduce
heat to 250 F, flip duck legs (skin side up), cover pan with foil or
a lid and place it in oven and continue to roast for an additional
hour.
After
one hour shut the oven off and use this interval prep your salad and
other sides. The legs will hold just fine for up to an hour if they
are covered and undisturbed.
After
the sides have been prepped raise the oven to 375 F and remove the
foil/lids. Bake an additional 30 minutes – checking periodically
to make sure the skin is browning nicely. My new GE Profile convection oven is perfect for this task.
Immediately
prior to plating your meal open the wine allowing time for it to
breathe. If needed, finish your legs under a low broiler setting
for a few minutes.
Remove
from the oven and let rest for 10-15 minutes.
Use
the fat for cooking vegetables or frying eggs or potatoes. Strain
the fat through cheesecloth if you intend to keep it in your fridge
for an extended period. Tightly-covered it should keep for up to six
months.