More than 24 hours of heating with my almost lifetime supply of dead ash.
The only propane burned has been for the water heater and kitchen range.
Raising a toast to better living thru renewables.....
Door County, Wisconsin, USA - Where the strong survive and the weak are killed and eaten.
More than 24 hours of heating with my almost lifetime supply of dead ash.
The only propane burned has been for the water heater and kitchen range.
Raising a toast to better living thru renewables.....
I spent part of my an afternoon stacking freshly-split ash from the seemingly inexhaustible supply left for us following the 2020 logging operation. There remains an estimated twelve cords of 8-foot bolts stacked up at the north property line and my neighbors and I have been reducing it slowly and surely.
It would appear I have a couple of face cords readily available on the porch and under the granary lean-to. There's another two full cords in the granary as a reserve.
The gun deer opener is right around the corner so it's wise to have a supply on hand to keep the home fires burning.
Bring-on the dank and cold; it's true that firewood warms you twice. Cutting, splitting and stacking. Finally, burning.
By my estimate I have set-aside roughly three and a half full cords of stove wood.
Bring on the cold weather....
Over the last couple of weeks one of my pals and I cut a ginormous pile of ash harvested from our forest into stove wood lengths.
Last weekend our wives joined-in on the fun and we split and moved in two trips (by rough estimate) about three full cords of wood.
Stay-tuned.
Unless the mercury dips into serious negative territory the wood burner is generally up to the task of maintaining a cozy 70 degrees Fahrenheit on the first floor living quarters here at The Platz.
After replenishing the wood rack on the porch we're nearing the halfway point on wood consumption for the heating season.
A FB friend of mine shared an article with me that was recently published in The Guardian. Like my family, he supplements his heat with wood during the colder months at our latitude. My sense is that he was more concerned and inquisitive than alarmed. His friends on the email chain appeared more alarmed. The background is as follows:
A recent study conducted
in Athens, Greece has resulted in research that supports the notion
that wood burning stoves in urban areas are responsible for almost
half of people’s exposure to cancer-causing chemicals found in air
pollution particles. I am reminded that only two generations ago my forebears heated their homes with coal. Yup, bituminous coal for daytime heat and anthracite for banking the fire overnight. The last house I owned still had the coal chute built into the basement wall for easy delivery. And the rafters above the footprint of the coal bunker were still covered in coal dust. The air quality back then was horrific. Burning all that coal left a pall - a miasma - across the sky when conditions were sub-optimal. PAHs ruled.
The introduction of gas forced-air heat technology made the previous technology obsolete by the time the 1960s rolled-around. Like coal, natural gas was a non-renewable fossil fuel; but cleaner-burning than its predecessor. But I digress.
The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tiny pollution particles are produced by burning fuels and have long been known to have carcinogenic effects. This new study examined the sources of the PAHs and suggests that wood burning produced them in larger quantities than the diesel fuel or gasoline used for vehicles.
This is important on several levels. Researchers
suggest that smoke from wood burning is much more toxic than other
types of particles suggesting that wood burning is a significant
driver of long-term carcinogenic risk. Nevertheless, the
concentration of the PAHs in the Athens study was below EU limits but
double the World Health
Organization’s reference level. Based on WHO data, the PAHs in
Athens would be expected to cause 5 extra cancer cases for every
100,000 people. Can the EU and WHO have it both ways?
The questions that come to mind include the following:
My conclusion is that this study is incomplete and raises more questions than it answers. I would like more background and further study of rural v. urban air quality, results with various wood fuels and stove technology and regulation. If I had to hazard a guess, US and Canadian air quality standards are stronger with added emphasis paid on cleaner-burning technologies in North America. That our diesel regulations are stricter than those of Europe comes to mind.
With modern stove technology my take-away is that choosing to heat with wood continues to be good.
Not quite - but close.
So far this autumn we have not had to run the furnace. We've been heating our living space with stove wood.
And generally keeping our living area a comfy 72 F.
Keeping the furnace turned-off overnight the temps drop gradually as the fire dies out and sleeping temps of 69 F or less return.
And the next day we begin the process all over again.....
This amber lager has a dark reddish-colored body with good clarity and a decent white head.