Election Economics

It should come as no surprise that for many individuals and households their standard of living improved during the time Donald Trump was in the White House.  That's not to say that things ended badly with the COVID pandemic and recession at the close of his term of office; people tend to remember the positive and discount the negative.

It is textbook economics that massive stimulus spending and supply chain disruptions during both the Trump and Biden administrations are the causal contributors to the recent spike in inflation.   The impact of inflation materialized during Biden's occupation of the White House.  Consequently, many individuals associate inflation as something Biden is solely responsible-for.  Surprised?  Voters aren't economists. Economics is complicated stuff for anybody who drinks from the Face Book cesspool of lazy economic thought.  Excess liquidity and stimulus largess was the primary cause and interventionist action by the federal reserve is the prescribed cure.  Sure, I get the politics of gaslighting the inflation issue.  But I digress.

Under Biden many individuals and families have struggled with inflation.  And while conditions have improved this may not be enough for some voters.  For Biden that is a burdensome problem.

Trump has any manner of personal flaws, admires bad guys like Vladimir Putin, tried to steal an election, fomented a riot and continues to deny his 2020 election loss.  For Trump that is a burdensome problem.

For both Trump and Biden their administrations enjoyed the benefit of economic success and the challenges of economic headwinds.  Nothing new under the sun there.

There are voters that loathe Donald Trump and there are voters who loathe Joe Biden.  Voters frequently judge their presidents based upon their personal economic gains or losses coincident with a given administration.  Confirmation bias too.  Because I go out of my way to not allow politics to infect financial decisions I've prospered during the reign of both of these presidents.  Actually every president for as long as it mattered.

As a recovering financial guy it's easy for me to view the current economic condition with a rational eye.  What I see is an American economy that grew at a healthy clip in 2023.  Unemployment remained low, inflation continued to drop, job growth is holding steady, real wages (adjusted for inflation) exceed pre-COVID levels.  And exceeding forecasts, GDP growth climbed by 3.3 percent in the last quarter.  Speaking of forecasts, a year ago expectations were for a recession.  Today it is expected that while growth may slow in 2024; in the absence of an unexpected outside event (read: wider middle east war), no major downturn.  Consumer sentiment should continue to rebound.

If you want to throw your support to Biden because you believe you'll prosper knock yourself out.  If you're a Trump backer because you're convinced the current economy is a hell hole; hey, knock yourself out.  Know this:  election outcomes are more frequently determined by rational individuals found in the middle.  Namely independent and disaffected voters.

Just last month, polling by Gallup highlighted that more voters now identify as independent - forty-three percent - tying the previous high not seen since 2014.  Ponder the implications of this shift in light of the 2024 election.

The impact of a single president over something as huge and complicated as our economy is frequently overstated.

A platform of grievance and retribution doesn't cut it for me.

That's my nuance.

P.S. - At the time this is published the markets have also set record highs. Nevertheless, I acquired shares of BA at a significant discount recently.  An assembly mistake is not the same as a design defect.