Last week one of my pals over at the Day Job introduced
me to The Five People Shaping My Worldview by John Mauldin. Mauldin has assembled the writings of five bright individuals to
help us better understand the trends shaping the future of financial markets,
and our economy. I got sucked-in. This is good stuff.
In Essay 2 George Gilder correctly points out
that a thriving entrepreneurial environment requires predictable carriers such as
the rule of law, the maintenance of order, the defense of property rights, the
reliability and restraint of regulation, the transparency of accounts, the
stability of money, and a level of taxation commensurate with a predictable
role of government.
Gilder continues
with the premise that in order for innovation to thrive and living standards
to rise over the coming decades, we must return to a “low-entropy" legal,
regulatory, tax, and monetary policy. Too much noisy interference from
governments and central banks distorts market signals. They also increase the
hassles of doing business, which stifles innovation and discourages
entrepreneurship. Ultimately, this makes the country less wealthy and
prosperous.
Is the supposition that all
government activity is noise begs the question.
It is sometimes surprising how little good or effective governance is
needed to keep an economy running. As
one of the commentators observed it is useful to consider the before and after
conditions for Iraq when Saddam Hussein was deposed. The average Iraqi, if being truthful, will
tell you he was better off under Saddam than the U.S. backed government.
In Essay 3 Karen Harris advances the theory
that technology, automation and the declining cost of distance – a topic which
fits hand in glove with automation, and has profound implications for investors
and entrepreneurs.
Consider this: the
declining cost of distance has the potential to trigger a major lifestyle shift
away from city centers, similar in scope and impact to the US suburban exodus
between 1950 and 1980. Based on that scenario, we would expect the move out of
US urban centers between 2010 and 2025 to rise to about 6% of the population
per decade, or up to 24 million people in total by 2025.” A move of this magnitude would have massive
implications for the economy and the employment landscape. A mass exodus to rural areas on this scale could
create a boom in the construction industry, akin to what took place in the
1950s. Conversely, urban real-estate prices, which are notoriously high across
the globe, could plummet as demand falls.
Like I said - this is good stuff.
Curl-up with a glass of wine in front of the warming glow of your laptop
and be sure to follow the five essay series here.
No comments:
Post a Comment